<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steven Soderbergh and Mark Romanek on Digital Filmmaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/</link>
	<description>An Ongoing Case Study in Art &#38; Commerce</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WaltDe</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltDe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>Very good reading. Peace until next time.
WaltDe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good reading. Peace until next time.<br />
WaltDe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiggyWittit</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>JiggyWittit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Kewl blog you got goin on up here.
Peace, JiggyWittit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kewl blog you got goin on up here.<br />
Peace, JiggyWittit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting Greens</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting Greens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Do you allow readers to subscribe to this rss feed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you allow readers to subscribe to this rss feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TreeFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>TreeFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Terrific Blog you have. Peace Out.
TreeFrog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific Blog you have. Peace Out.<br />
TreeFrog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Torres</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Torres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Josh,

Thanks for doing the transcription. Very cool and time consuming, I'm sure. If anyone cares about history of "electronic cinema," get hold of the Rumble Fish DVD by Francis Ford Coppola. They have a few documentaries that cover the making of and sound that are fascinating. He shot the entire movie blue screen as a pre-vis strategy. In the early 80's! And the director's commentary is good. Not to mention the movie is visually rich (and not because it's black and white). So that's it: Rumble Fish. Zoetrope treats DVDs with great respect. Also check the Zoetrope DVD for Roman Coppola's "C Q". If you've seen David Holzman's Diary you've already seen C Q, but the DVD is quite fascinating. Best of Luck- Anthony </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>Thanks for doing the transcription. Very cool and time consuming, I&#8217;m sure. If anyone cares about history of &#8220;electronic cinema,&#8221; get hold of the Rumble Fish DVD by Francis Ford Coppola. They have a few documentaries that cover the making of and sound that are fascinating. He shot the entire movie blue screen as a pre-vis strategy. In the early 80&#8217;s! And the director&#8217;s commentary is good. Not to mention the movie is visually rich (and not because it&#8217;s black and white). So that&#8217;s it: Rumble Fish. Zoetrope treats DVDs with great respect. Also check the Zoetrope DVD for Roman Coppola&#8217;s &#8220;C Q&#8221;. If you&#8217;ve seen David Holzman&#8217;s Diary you&#8217;ve already seen C Q, but the DVD is quite fascinating. Best of Luck- Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Oakhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Oakhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-37</guid>
		<description>GOOD TECH INFO JERRY!  Thanks for the post, however....

In the INDIE filmmaker world, you can ABSOLUTELY compare these cameras.  Do the tech specs match up?  No? But a very very similar END OUTPUT can be achieved by using a skilled DP and Post Guru - and for thousands of dollars less I might add.

In the INDIE world, its very relavant to ask these kinds of questions.

But really really good stuff in your comment, man.  Thanks much for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD TECH INFO JERRY!  Thanks for the post, however&#8230;.</p>
<p>In the INDIE filmmaker world, you can ABSOLUTELY compare these cameras.  Do the tech specs match up?  No? But a very very similar END OUTPUT can be achieved by using a skilled DP and Post Guru - and for thousands of dollars less I might add.</p>
<p>In the INDIE world, its very relavant to ask these kinds of questions.</p>
<p>But really really good stuff in your comment, man.  Thanks much for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-35</guid>
		<description>You can't compare Z1 and F950. F950 resolves 2x as many lines horizontally and vertically as Z1 in CF25 mode. The problem with F950 is it looks too sharp subjectively, because of lack of grain, so you would normally soften up the image with a pro mist etc. filter. With Z1 you shoot without softening. 

Z1 in CF25 has the same resolution as Panasonic HVX200 in 1080p. It is also a lot less noisy. Once you increase gain on the Sony to match the noise of the Panasonic, the Sony becomes more light sensitive.

Z1 is about 1 F stop slower than F950. 

Z1 is the only 1/3" camera that can intercut with pro HD cameras, becuse it is very noise-free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t compare Z1 and F950. F950 resolves 2x as many lines horizontally and vertically as Z1 in CF25 mode. The problem with F950 is it looks too sharp subjectively, because of lack of grain, so you would normally soften up the image with a pro mist etc. filter. With Z1 you shoot without softening. </p>
<p>Z1 in CF25 has the same resolution as Panasonic HVX200 in 1080p. It is also a lot less noisy. Once you increase gain on the Sony to match the noise of the Panasonic, the Sony becomes more light sensitive.</p>
<p>Z1 is about 1 F stop slower than F950. </p>
<p>Z1 is the only 1/3&#8243; camera that can intercut with pro HD cameras, becuse it is very noise-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Oakhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Oakhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-34</guid>
		<description>David-

There are some MAJOR differneces between the $100K+ CineAlta and the $4G Z1U.  In short, a SIMILAR (stressing similar) look could be achieved using the Z1U provided you had equivalent accessories, lighting, and a FUCKING BADASS CAMERA OPERATOR/ DP, but even then, the F950 is still going to look better.  When costs are factored in you may find the Z1U to be fitting for your project.

This question is not exactly apples to apples.  Read Adam Wilt's article which you can find liked here:
http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=84

Thanks for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-</p>
<p>There are some MAJOR differneces between the $100K+ CineAlta and the $4G Z1U.  In short, a SIMILAR (stressing similar) look could be achieved using the Z1U provided you had equivalent accessories, lighting, and a FUCKING BADASS CAMERA OPERATOR/ DP, but even then, the F950 is still going to look better.  When costs are factored in you may find the Z1U to be fitting for your project.</p>
<p>This question is not exactly apples to apples.  Read Adam Wilt&#8217;s article which you can find liked here:<br />
<a href="http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=84" rel="nofollow">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=84</a></p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david chung</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>david chung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Great job. I was wondering if the Sony HD Z1U is capable of doing the same job as the Sony CineAlta 950? Would you have any info on this questions?
Thanks and great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job. I was wondering if the Sony HD Z1U is capable of doing the same job as the Sony CineAlta 950? Would you have any info on this questions?<br />
Thanks and great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.joshoakhurst.com/2006/02/03/steven-soderbergh-and-mark-romanek-on-digital-filmmaking/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshoakhurst.com/?p=95#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Josh, you said in the beggining:

"This commentary is a little better than average in terms of most commentaries"

What is your TOP 10 of the best directorÂ´s and dpÂ´s audio commentaries on DVD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, you said in the beggining:</p>
<p>&#8220;This commentary is a little better than average in terms of most commentaries&#8221;</p>
<p>What is your TOP 10 of the best directorÂ´s and dpÂ´s audio commentaries on DVD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
