A while back, I made the comment here that I believed purchasing the Panasonic DVX100b (24p standard def) camera was unwise (okay, I actually said STUPID) considering that you can pick up a Sony Z1U (60i high definition) for about $1000 more. My argument was, and still is, that an Indie interested in feature film production will ensure his/her movies to be more “future proof” and ultimately more marketable by choosing to shoot low-end HD(V) rather than using tricked out SD means.
When you’re talking about spending less than $5Gs on production equipment, I undoubtedly would advise people to shoot HD(V) even though they currently may not be able to shoot using the vaunted 24p look enabled by the DVX100b (and right, if we’re talking another $5G’s worth of money - everyone could just shoot on the HVX200 and get the best of HD and 24p and then puppy dogs and buttons would rain from the sky!)
But since, we’re talking about micro-budget Indie cinema, Jeff Klein of Neutral Collective makes a great argument for the DVX100b.
Jeff’s Words:
I don’t care what people say; a little one chip sony/jvc HD cam CANNOT make the same
quality image that a good SD cam can…It just won’t happen. The glass,
focal length, and design play such a big part, that when creating a
“feature,” you should really think about quality of the image getting to the
ccd/cmos rather than think of the codec/native chip res. A prime example is
28 Days, yeah they used XL’s, but with $10K 35mm film lenses on them. I
will always agree that the DV/HD(V) revolution is going to change the film
industry forever, but that is because it is a relative parallel between cost
and quality. And this argument about indie film making REALLY is more about
cost - the quality is already great across the board.
And the reality is, I bought my DVX100B, a crane, two wireless samson XLR mics, a tripod, a wide angle, 3 pc filter set, 4 3800mah batteries, 30 panny DV tapes , and still had some cash for lunch…..All for the same price as ONE Z1U would have cost.
And that is the idea…I just got everything I need to make a movie for under $4400…and I can assure you that it will look just as good on a SD TV, DVD player, or Projector (with still makes up 90% + of the market).
Furthermore, we haven’t even discussed the edit/computer issue and cost when
shooting HD….save that for another day….but I will say this…Needing
those sort of resources and money [the current costs of making and HD feature, which CAN be considerably more than shooting SD] doesnt seem very independent.
But then again they are calling Mel’s new $100 million movie independent…
–
Jeff makes a really solid argument here: For the cheapest form of Indie Filmmaking, the IMMEDIATE cost/benefit of shooting high-end SD vs low end HD(V) seems to favor DVX100b production. However, I personally believe this argument to be extremely short sided, and therefore, bunk.
For real world considerations, what does this mean?
$4,500 equipment budget
High-end SD gets you a camera, filters, mics, carrying case, tripod, small crane, a bunch of blank media, and lunch. Assuming you have modest post infrastructure in place, you’re good to go.
Low-end HD(V) gets you…a camera. Plus, now you need to beef up your editing and storage systems. This will require you to find more outside resources, therefore making you “less” Indie.
–
Okay, so shooting SD may be a solid “real world” argument where micro budgets are concerned, except for the fact that by definition, most Micro Indie Filmmakers are extremely resourceful AS IS. I believe that MOST Indies would welcome the task of having to “borrow” mics, tripods, and other miscellaneous equipment if their end product would HAVE A GREATER CHANCE OF BEING SEEN BY A LARGER AUDIENCE (and come on; no one here is going to tell me that a 24p SD production is more marketable than a 60i HD(V) feature). In addition, post production on a HD(V) feature DOESN’T HAVE TO cost more than a SD production. Specifically for the Z1U; label all your tapes properly, be smart upon ingesting (break your clips up), and bring in all that footy at SD resolution.
If you consider yourself a crafty fimmaker and barterer, the end benefit of shooting a low-end HD(V) feature is that you’ll have your SD ready cut for the same price as shooting SD natively.
And to sweeten the deal, when those distributors come knocking again for the HD rights, you’re already in the game, whereas your DVX100b counterparts will be SOL. Sure, you may have to get a little more creative in getting shit done, but that never hurt anyone’s production.